From checking your litter box to our letter box
[In the Baronial 2022 upshot of Packaging South asia, we beginning published Deepak Manchanda'southward Open Letter to the PM, Bank check your litter box! It has since been republished both in print and on the web and the Open Alphabetic character to the PM was also sent out every bit the kickoff column in the Sun Pattern and Marketing web newsletter series on 31 March 2019. – https://bit.ly/2CJw0mc]. We have received a response that we reproduce below. – Editor
To the editor –
I read Deepak Manchanda's very nice open letter to the PM. The issues raised by Manchanda-ji and the suggested acronyms and processes are admittedly not bad. I have always said and felt that the governments are not doing their job well and penalising the common man for information technology.
There are more things to the Swachh India Abhiyan – Step if you like. The listing would exist topped by municipal failure in my opinion. This is a major area nearly which no i wants to talk or pay attention to. The cleaning and scavenging staff, the Safai Karmachari, is hardly visible today and perhaps the least visible of all public works services staffs. I retrieve that fifty-fifty equally late as the close of 1960s, we saw the roads existence swept and open drains being cleaned on a daily basis. Later, nosotros saw a reject
– the sweepers began to vanish from the scene, and the muck removed from the drains began to exist left past the drains in little piles, where information technology would dry in sun and become diddled in the current of air, to be redistributed, breathed in and ingested by hapless populations.
In my stance, it is i of the minimum responsibilities of the municipalities to provide prophylactic drinking water to the citizens. In the 1970s nosotros all drank from the taps. By late 1980s, packaged drinking water was everywhere and the quality of tap water had become un t for human being consumption in many places. This was demonstrated
in a damning survey conducted at railway stations in the central and eastern Upward. Over a big area the water was found to be unsafe, while this was besides common knowledge.
The bottled water industry and the water bottle industry proliferated because of this unmarried major municipal failure. RO systems of all kinds became a necessity in every household and restaurant. If this was the then government's intention to raise these industries and provide employment through this perversion, it is a different thing. Even today you nd packaged water bottle on the dais and everywhere in government functions also pathetically revealing the inadequacy of the system to provide rubber drinking water on tap to the nation.
NGT and the government continue to promulgate rules to punish citizens for using the ubiquitous bag and other plastic products. Bigger fines mean more than graft on the route and more harassment of poor householders. Consider the plight of a woman who toils at a construction site in scorching heat or pouring rain, in sub-man atmospheric condition as a hod-carrier and picks up some greenish vegetables for her family on her way habitation in a plastic bag every bit that is all she has. She may go accosted by a policeman and intimidated to cough up an amount that she may be earning in a whole week or more. Bottles would not exist seen around if at that place was condom water on tap likewise.
The question I am request is – Are the governments, NGT and Judiciary interested in just passing orders that may be unenforceable in the existing organisation, and worse, which may lead to coercion and harassment of common man while fostering more than abuse at certain levels or, do we want a responsible governance process that would first demand the governments to fulfil their municipal duties? If the roads are swept properly and regularly, much of the mail service-consumer waste would exist collected by itself and the flying bags would be in the municipal system's control to a huge extent. Banning everything is like shooting fish in a barrel but we need solutions too. Linen numberless are expensive. Paper bags go out a huge carbon footprint and have major adverse impact on the surroundings.
Does anyone want information technology? Do the governments and municipalities have no responsibility? Is everything the responsibility of someone else, most of all the mutual human? Do we want to do the incommunicable and not hash out the doable, the impossible being educating the masses? I volition write on the segregation system's utter failure even in the awarded clean cities at another time.
– Rakesh Shah
Rakesh ji has forcefully pointed out that packaging waste management needs to be primarily a shared responsibleness among the municipal and other agencies appointed for the purpose. Past introducing the thought of Extended Producer Responsibleness in the Waste Management Rules, there appears to be an intent to shirk and shift that responsibility towards private agencies. I hold that at an administrative level we should aim to work towards what is collectively do-able instead of imposing orders that are un- implementable or ambiguous. Cheers for your timely comment.
– Deepak Manchanda
Source: https://packagingsouthasia.com/type-of-article/editorial/from-checking-your-litter-box-to-our-letter-box/
0 Response to "From checking your litter box to our letter box"
Post a Comment